Section 347: Counterfeiting a Property Mark Used by Another or Public Servant

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita • Chapter XVIII: Of Offences Relating to Documents & Property Marks • Official Statutory Text & Legal Guide

Chapter XVIII: Of Offences Relating to Documents & Property Marks
Any Magistrate / Magistrate 1st Class
Bailable
Non-Cognizable
Formerly Sec 483, 484 IPC

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 347

Section 347 penalises counterfeiting any property mark used by any other person, or counterfeiting any property mark used by a public servant.

  • Counterfeiting Mark: Replicating or simulating an authentic property mark.
  • Owner or Public Authority: The mark belongs to another private person, or is an official mark used by a public servant (customs, forest, railways).
  • Aggravated Public Mark Clause: Significantly enhanced punishment if the mark is an official public servant verification mark.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Dau Dayal v. State of U.P. AIR 1959 SC 433: The Supreme Court affirmed that manufacturing bogus dies to stamp fake brand marks on commercial goods is a completed counterfeiting offence.
  • State of U.P. v. Ram Swarup (1974) 4 SCC 764: Held that counterfeiting official government hallmark and excise stamps strikes at the sovereign revenue.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

Comparison of the microscopic die impressions by a forensic mark examiner will prove replication. If a public servant's mark is counterfeited, the offence is non-bailable.