Section 342: Counterfeiting Device or Mark Used for Authenticating Documents

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita • Chapter XVIII: Of Offences Relating to Documents & Property Marks • Official Statutory Text & Legal Guide

Chapter XVIII: Of Offences Relating to Documents & Property Marks
Magistrate 1st Class
Bailable (Sec 342-1) / Non-Bailable (Sec 342-2)
Non-Cognizable
Formerly Sec 475, 476 IPC

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 342

Section 342 punishes counterfeiting any device or mark used for authenticating documents, or having possession of materials bearing counterfeit authenticating marks.

  • Authenticating Device or Mark: Watermarks, security threads, holographic seals, or digital tokens used to authenticate legal documents.
  • Act of Counterfeiting: Replicating the security authentication mark.
  • Intent to Authenticate Forgeries: Intending to give spurious documents the appearance of genuine official documents.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Desh Bandhu Gupta v. N.L. Anand (1994) 1 SCC 131: The Supreme Court noted that counterfeiting court watermarks and judicial stamp paper strikes at the sovereign revenue and legal system.
  • Arjun Panditrao Khotkar v. Kailash Kushanrao Gorantyal (2020) 7 SCC 1: Emphasised the necessity of forensic electronic verification when dealing with digital authentication mechanisms.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

Security Printing Press (SPMCIL) technical certificates proving that the watermark or paper mesh is spurious will substantiate the charge.