Section 330: Lurking House-Trespass and House-Breaking

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita • Chapter XVII: Of Offences Against Property • Official Statutory Text & Legal Guide

Chapter XVII: Of Offences Against Property
Any Magistrate
Non-Bailable
Cognizable
Formerly Sec 443, 445, 453 IPC

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 330

Section 330 defines 'Lurking House-Trespass' and 'House-Breaking', penalising house-trespass committed after taking precautions to conceal such trespass, or effecting entry through forcible or unauthorized apertures.

  • Lurking House-Trespass: House-trespass committed after taking precautions to conceal entry from anyone having a right to exclude.
  • House-Breaking Modes: Entry effected through: (1) apertures made by the trespasser; (2) scaling walls/roofs; (3) unfastening locks; (4) breaking doors; (5) opening by key; or (6) threats/collusion.
  • Sanctity of Enclosure: Violating residential or commercial locked enclosures.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • State of Rajasthan v. Bhup Singh (1997) 10 SCC 675: Held that scaling boundary walls and breaking window grilles at night establishes both lurking and house-breaking under penal law.
  • Babulal v. State of U.P. (1994) 1 SCC 688: Affirmed that unfastening door chains or picking padlocks fulfills the statutory definitions of house-breaking.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

Crime scene inspection memos detailing broken locks, shattered window panes, or ladder impressions near roof parapets prove the precise statutory aperture under Section 330.