Section 30: Act Done in Good Faith for Benefit of Person Without Consent

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita • Chapter III: General Exceptions • Official Statutory Text & Legal Guide

Chapter III: General Exceptions
Trial Court
Complete Defence
Non-Applicable
Formerly Sec 92 IPC

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 30

Section 30 establishes the emergency exception for acts done in good faith for the benefit of a person without consent, protecting emergency medical treatment and life-saving interventions when obtaining consent is impossible.

  • Emergency Inability to Consent: Applies where circumstances render it impossible for the person to signify consent, or they are incapable of consent and have no guardian available.
  • Life-Saving Necessity: The act must be done in good faith for the person's benefit (e.g. an emergency surgeon performing a tracheotomy or amputating a crushed limb on an unconscious accident victim).
  • Strict Provisos: Does not extend to intentional causing of death or attempting to cause death.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Jacob Mathew v. State of Punjab (2005) 6 SCC 1: The Supreme Court recognized that emergency medical interventions performed on critical accident patients without prior consent are protected under Section 92 IPC (Section 30 BNS).
  • Samira Kohli v. Dr. Prabha Manchanda (2008) 2 SCC 1: Affirmed that while non-emergency surgical procedures require explicit consent, emergency surgeries necessary to save the patient's life are protected under the emergency exception.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

When defending an emergency room surgeon or trauma team sued for performing life-saving emergency surgery on an unconscious patient without family consent, produce the emergency casualty register: Section 30 BNS provides absolute criminal immunity.