Section 288: Negligent Conduct with Respect to Explosive Substance

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita • Chapter XV: Of Offences Affecting Public Health, Safety & Morals • Official Statutory Text & Legal Guide

Chapter XV: Of Offences Affecting Public Health, Safety & Morals
Any Magistrate
Bailable
Cognizable
Formerly Sec 286 IPC

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 288

Section 288 penalises rash or negligent conduct with respect to explosive substances, or failing to take sufficient precaution with explosives in one's possession to guard against danger.

  • Explosive Substances: Dynamite, RDX, detonators, blasting gel, or high-decibel firecracker chemicals.
  • Rash or Negligent Handling: Storing beyond licensed quantities, manufacturing in residential tenements, or blasting without sirens.
  • Public Endangerment: Creating imminent hazard of lethal blast or property devastation.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • State of Maharashtra v. Joseph Mingel Koli (1997) Cri LJ 3144: Held that illegal stockpiling of explosive detonators inside domestic houses constitutes gross criminal negligence.
  • Arjun Panditrao Khotkar v. Kailash Kushanrao Gorantyal (2020) 7 SCC 1: Emphasised strict scientific evidentiary standards when establishing hazardous chemical chain of custody.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

Controller of Explosives (PESO) reports detailing illegal storage quantities and lack of blast-proof magazines provide conclusive evidence.