Section 264: Omission to Apprehend or Sufferance of Escape by Public Servant

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita • Chapter XII: Of Contempts of Lawful Authority of Public Servants • Official Statutory Text & Legal Guide

Chapter XII: Of Contempts of Lawful Authority of Public Servants
Magistrate 1st Class / Any Magistrate
Bailable
Non-Cognizable
Formerly Sec 225A IPC

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 264

Section 264 penalises a public servant legally bound to apprehend or keep in custody any person, who intentionally omits to apprehend or suffers that person to escape in cases not otherwise provided for.

  • Public Servant Custodial Duty: Officer charged by law with apprehending or detaining a person (e.g., in civil or administrative arrest).
  • Intentional Omission or Sufferance: Consciously failing to arrest or allowing escape.
  • Residual Application: Covers statutory detentions outside standard criminal sentences.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • State of Gujarat v. Kansara Manilal Bhikhalal AIR 1964 SC 1893: Clarified the comprehensive statutory scheme ensuring that public servants cannot evade accountability for custodial defaults.
  • Emperor v. Ramaswamy (1936) MWN 1150: Held that public servants executing administrative or civil warrants are strictly bound by the same standards of integrity.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

Check whether the underlying arrest warrant was civil or administrative (e.g., tax recovery, maintenance arrears under Section 144 BNSS) and whether the officer had jurisdiction.