Section 254: Harbouring Robbers or Dacoits

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita • Chapter XII: Of Contempts of Lawful Authority of Public Servants • Official Statutory Text & Legal Guide

Chapter XII: Of Contempts of Lawful Authority of Public Servants
Magistrate 1st Class
Bailable
Cognizable
Formerly Sec 216A IPC

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 254

Section 254 punishes knowingly harbouring, concealing, or assisting persons who are about to commit or have committed robbery or dacoity.

  • Identity of Gang: The persons harboured are about to commit, or have committed, robbery or dacoity.
  • Knowledge: The accused knows or has reason to believe their criminal identity or intentions.
  • Provision of Shelter/Logistics: Supplying arms, ammunition, shelter, food, or safe transit to the gang.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • State of Maharashtra v. Joseph Mingel Koli (1997) Cri LJ 3144: Affirmed that harbouring dacoits requires conscious provision of hideouts and logistical support to a criminal gang.
  • Raju v. State of Uttarakhand (2019) 11 SCC 641: Reiterated that proof of criminal association and conscious shelter is required to convict under dacoity harbouring provisions.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

The statutory exception for husband and wife applies here. For non-spouses, recovery of looted property, ammunition, or vehicles from the premises establishes knowledge.