Section 250: Taking Gift to Screen Offender from Punishment

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita • Chapter XII: Of Contempts of Lawful Authority of Public Servants • Official Statutory Text & Legal Guide

Chapter XII: Of Contempts of Lawful Authority of Public Servants
Magistrate 1st Class
Bailable
Cognizable
Formerly Sec 213 IPC

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 250

Section 250 punishes accepting or attempting to obtain any gratification or restoration of property in consideration of concealing an offence, screening an offender, or not proceeding against them.

  • Demand or Acceptance of Gratification: Accepting, obtaining, or agreeing to accept any gift, money, or property.
  • Corrupt Consideration: In consideration of screening any person from legal punishment, or not proceeding against them.
  • Compounding Serious Crimes: Unlawful compounding or hush-money agreements regarding non-compoundable offences.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Gian Singh v. State of Punjab (2012) 10 SCC 303: The Supreme Court held that while compoundable disputes can be settled, serious and heinous offences cannot be compromised for money or private gratification.
  • Union of India v. P.K. Roy AIR 1968 SC 850: Affirmed that public justice cannot be bought or compromised through private pecuniary arrangements.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

Distinguish between lawful compounding of compoundable offences under Section 359 BNSS (old Section 320 CrPC) and unlawful hush-money taken to stifle prosecution of heinous, non-compoundable crimes.