Section 247: Fraudulently Obtaining Decree for Sum Not Due

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita • Chapter XII: Of Contempts of Lawful Authority of Public Servants • Official Statutory Text & Legal Guide

Chapter XII: Of Contempts of Lawful Authority of Public Servants
Magistrate 1st Class
Bailable
Non-Cognizable
Formerly Sec 210 IPC

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 247

Section 247 punishes fraudulently obtaining a decree or order for a sum not due, or for a larger sum than is due, or obtaining execution after satisfaction.

  • Obtaining Decree or Order: Securing a judgment, decree, or execution order from a court.
  • No Debt Due: The sum claimed is not due, or was already paid, or property not belonging to judgment-debtor is targeted.
  • Fraudulent Deceit: Obtained through concealment, suppression, or fraudulent misrepresentation.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • S.P. Chengalvaraya Naidu v. Jagannath (1994) 1 SCC 1: The Supreme Court held that non-disclosure of a release deed to fraudulently obtain a preliminary decree is fraud on the court, vitiating the decree.
  • Indian Bank v. Satyam Fibres (India) Pvt. Ltd. (1996) 5 SCC 550: The Apex Court affirmed its inherent power to recall orders obtained by fraud and initiate criminal proceedings against the perpetrator.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

Produce bank clearance certificates or registered satisfaction memos to prove the debt was paid prior to execution, establishing fraudulent procurement under Section 247.