Section 243: Fraudulent Removal or Concealment of Property to Prevent Seizure

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita • Chapter XII: Of Contempts of Lawful Authority of Public Servants • Official Statutory Text & Legal Guide

Chapter XII: Of Contempts of Lawful Authority of Public Servants
Any Magistrate
Bailable
Non-Cognizable
Formerly Sec 206 IPC

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 243

Section 243 penalises fraudulent removal, concealment, or transfer of property to prevent its seizure as a forfeiture or in execution of a decree.

  • Impending Seizure or Execution: Property liable to forfeiture, fine, or seizure in execution of a court decree.
  • Fraudulent Transfer or Concealment: Selling, gifting, removing, or concealing the asset fraudulently.
  • Intent to Thwart Execution: Done with intent to prevent the property from being seized or taken in execution.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Kameswaramma v. Radhakrishna Murthy (1963) 3 SCR 359: The Supreme Court noted that fraudulent conveyances executed to defeat execution creditors or penal fines are void and criminally actionable.
  • S.P. Chengalvaraya Naidu v. Jagannath (1994) 1 SCC 1: Reaffirmed that fraud unravels everything; clandestine dissipation of assets subject to judicial attachment constitutes criminal deceit.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

Examine the date of the impugned gift deed or transfer relative to the date of attachment or judgment. If executed immediately after an adverse verdict without consideration, fraudulent intent is established.