Section 239: Intentional Omission to Give Information of Offence by Person Bound

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita • Chapter XII: Of Contempts of Lawful Authority of Public Servants • Official Statutory Text & Legal Guide

Chapter XII: Of Contempts of Lawful Authority of Public Servants
Any Magistrate
Bailable
Non-Cognizable
Formerly Sec 202 IPC

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 239

Section 239 penalises intentional omission to give information of an offence by a person who is legally bound to give such information to the authorities.

  • Commission of Offence: Knowledge of the commission of a cognizable or reportable offence.
  • Statutory Obligation: The person is legally bound by statute (such as hospital staff, security personnel, or village officers) to report the crime.
  • Intentional Omission: Deliberate and conscious refusal to transmit information to the police.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • State of Karnataka v. K. Gopala (1996) 2 SCC 528: Held that intentional omission must be proved by cogent evidence; mere delay caused by distress or trauma cannot be equated to intentional omission.
  • Ram Kumar v. State of Haryana (1995) Supp 1 SCC 248: Affirmed that statutory duty-holders who suppress knowledge of murder or heinous crimes are directly liable under this section.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

Defence should establish lack of legal obligation under Section 33 BNSS or justifiable fear of immediate mortal retribution by the criminals.