Section 212: Knowingly Furnishing False Information to Public Servant

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita • Chapter XI: Of Offences by or Relating to Public Servants • Official Statutory Text & Legal Guide

Chapter XI: Of Offences by or Relating to Public Servants
Any Magistrate
Bailable
Non-Cognizable
Formerly Sec 177 IPC

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 212

Section 212 penalises knowingly furnishing false information to a public servant by a person legally bound to furnish information on that subject.

  • Legal Duty to Furnish Info: The accused is bound by law to state the truth or supply information on the subject matter.
  • False Representation: The information supplied is factually false.
  • Guilty Knowledge: The accused knows or has reason to believe the information to be false at the time of providing it.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • State of Gujarat v. Kansara Manilal Bhikhalal AIR 1964 SC 1893: The Supreme Court observed that supplying intentionally fabricated data under statutory reporting requirements undermines administrative oversight.
  • Bholanath v. State of U.P. (1976) 4 SCC 682: Affirmed that mens rea is the essence of the offence; an honest mistake or reliance on unverified subordinate accounts negates criminal liability.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

Cross-examination of the public servant must test whether the accused had personal knowledge of the falsity or was merely conveying second-hand information in good faith. Written complaint under Section 215 BNSS is mandatory.