Section 202: Public Servant Unlawfully Engaging in Trade

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita • Chapter XI: Of Offences by or Relating to Public Servants • Official Statutory Text & Legal Guide

Chapter XI: Of Offences by or Relating to Public Servants
Magistrate 1st Class
Bailable
Non-Cognizable
Formerly Sec 168 IPC

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 202

Section 202 penalises public servants who, being legally bound as such public servants not to engage in trade, unlawfully engage in commercial trade or business.

  • Public Servant Status: The individual must be a public servant subject to statutory service rules prohibiting commercial enterprise.
  • Legal Prohibition: An express legal bar or civil service code prohibiting direct or indirect private commercial engagement.
  • Commercial Engagement: Active or beneficial operation of a trade, commercial partnership, or business venture for pecuniary profit.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • State of Gujarat v. Mahesh Kumar Dhirajlal Thakkar (1980) 2 SCC 322: Held that engagement in commercial trade involves continuous business enterprise for profit; isolated transactions of managing family ancestral property do not constitute unlawful trade.
  • Rabindra Nath Ghosal v. University of Calcutta (2002) 7 SCC 478: Observed that statutory bans on trade for public officials are essential to maintain institutional neutrality and eliminate conflicts of interest.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

In trials under Section 202, financial paper trails—including GST registrations, partnership deeds, and bank director signatures—are decisive. Defence may establish that investments were passive capital holdings rather than active trade administration.