Section 2: Definitions of General Statutory Terms in Sanhita

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita • Chapter I: Preliminary • Official Statutory Text & Legal Guide

Chapter I: Preliminary
All Criminal Courts
Non-Applicable
Non-Applicable
Consolidation of Sec 6–52A IPC

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 2

Section 2 provides the foundational statutory definitions of general terms employed throughout the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, anchoring the interpretation of penal provisions.

  • Comprehensive Statutory Definitions: Defines critical penal concepts including 'child', 'court', 'dishonestly', 'document', 'fraudulently', 'good faith', 'injury', 'judge', 'movable property', and 'public servant'.
  • Modernized Evidentiary Harmony: Harmonizes definitions of 'document' and 'valuable security' with the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 to encompass electronic and digital records.
  • Mens Rea Thresholds: Establishes precise operational distinctions between 'dishonestly' (intention of causing wrongful gain or loss) and 'fraudulently' (intent to defraud accompanied by deceit and injury).
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Dr. Vimla v. Delhi Administration (AIR 1963 SC 1572): The Supreme Court laid down the classic test: 'fraudulently' requires both deceit and injury or intended injury to some person, distinguishing it from mere unauthorized or irregular conduct.
  • State of Gujarat v. Manshankar Prabhashankar Dwivedi (1972) 2 SCC 392: Examined the definition of 'public servant', affirming that discharge of public duty under statutory authority defines public status.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

In drafting quashing petitions under Section 528 BNSS for cheating or criminal breach of trust, scrutinize the FIR against Section 2 BNS definitions: demonstrate that the allegations reveal mere civil breach of contract lacking the statutory definition of 'dishonestly'.