Section 17: Act Done by Person Justified, or by Mistake of Fact Believing Justified by Law

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita • Chapter III: General Exceptions • Official Statutory Text & Legal Guide

Chapter III: General Exceptions
Trial Court
Complete Defence
Non-Applicable
Formerly Sec 79 IPC

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 17

Section 17 establishes that nothing is an offence which is done by any person who is justified by law, or who by reason of a mistake of fact and not by reason of a mistake of law in good faith believes himself to be justified by law.

  • Justified by Law: Applies where the law affirmatively authorizes or empowers a citizen or officer to act (e.g. private arrest under Section 40 BNSS).
  • Mistake of Fact Defense: Protects a person who honestly and reasonably misapprehends physical facts (e.g. mistaking a friend acting in a drama for a real robber).
  • Due Care and Attention: The mistake must be made in good faith after exercising reasonable inquiry and caution under the circumstances.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Chirangi v. State (1952) Cri LJ 1212: The Nagpur High Court acquitted a father who, in a state of delusion in a forest, mistook his son for a tiger and killed him, holding that the act was protected as a bona fide mistake of fact under Section 79 IPC (Section 17 BNS).
  • Keso Sahu v. Saligram Shah (1977) Cri LJ 1725: Held that a citizen who arrests a person mistakenly believing in good faith that a cognizable offence was committed is protected under this section.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

In assault or wrongful confinement trials where a citizen intervened to prevent what appeared to be an armed robbery or child abduction, lead evidence of lighting, screaming, and surrounding circumstances to establish bona fide mistake of fact under Section 17 BNS.