Section 76: Termination of conciliation proceedings

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 1996
Statutory Defined Terms in this Section: (Click any term for official legal definition)

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 76

Section 76 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 specifies the four exclusive modes by which conciliation proceedings are formally terminated.

  • Four Termination Modes: Conciliation proceedings are terminated: (a) by the signing of the settlement agreement by the parties, on the date of the agreement; (b) by written declaration of the conciliator that further efforts are no longer justified; (c) by written declaration of parties to conciliator; (d) by written declaration of a party to the other party and conciliator.
  • Unilateral Right of Termination: Any party possesses the absolute right to terminate conciliation unilaterally at any stage under Section 76(d) by sending written notice.
  • Condition Precedent to Litigation: Formal termination under Section 76 lifts the statutory bar on initiating arbitration or judicial proceedings under Section 77.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Haresh Dayaram Thakur v. State of Maharashtra, (2000) 6 SCC 179: The Supreme Court authoritatively analyzed Section 76, ruling that conciliation terminates only in the four prescribed statutory ways; until terminated, proceedings remain pending.
  • Mysore Cements Ltd. v. Svedala Barmac Ltd., (2003) 10 SCC 375: Affirmed that unilateral termination by written declaration under Section 76(d) immediately terminates the conciliator's mandate.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

Before issuing a Section 21 notice of arbitration in a contract with mandatory conciliation, always issue a formal 'Notice of Termination of Conciliation under Section 76(d)' to formally lift the Section 77 litigation bar.