Section 25: Default of a party

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 1996
Statutory Defined Terms in this Section: (Click any term for official legal definition)

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 25

Section 25 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 governs the consequences of default of a party, empowering the tribunal to terminate proceedings if the claimant fails to communicate their statement of claim, or proceed ex parte if the respondent defaults without sufficient cause.

  • Claimant's Default - Termination: Section 25(a): If claimant fails to communicate their statement of claim in accordance with Section 23(1), the arbitral tribunal shall terminate the proceedings.
  • Respondent's Default - Ex Parte Proceedings: Section 25(b): If respondent fails to communicate statement of defence, tribunal shall continue proceedings without treating failure as an admission of allegations.
  • Failure to Appear or Produce Evidence: Section 25(c): If a party fails to appear at an oral hearing or produce documentary evidence, the tribunal may continue proceedings and make the award on evidence before it.
  • Sufficient Cause Safeguard: Default powers cannot be exercised if the defaulting party establishes 'sufficient cause' for their non-appearance or delay.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Srei Infrastructure Finance Ltd. v. Tuff Drilling (P) Ltd., (2018) 11 SCC 470: The Supreme Court authoritatively held that an arbitral tribunal terminating proceedings under Section 25(a) for failure to file a statement of claim possesses the inherent power to recall the termination order upon proof of sufficient cause.
  • Quippo Construction Equipment Ltd. v. Janardan Nirman (P) Ltd., (2020) 18 SCC 277: The Supreme Court affirmed that where a respondent willfully abstains after due notice, the tribunal is fully justified in proceeding ex parte under Section 25(c).
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

If representing a claimant unable to file a statement of claim due to unavoidable delay, file a detailed application showing 'sufficient cause' under Section 25(a); if proceedings were terminated, file a recall application citing Srei Infrastructure.