Section 22: Language

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 1996
Statutory Defined Terms in this Section: (Click any term for official legal definition)

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 22

Section 22 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 grants parties the autonomy to determine the language or languages to be used in arbitral proceedings, and empowers the tribunal to order translations of documentary evidence.

  • Party Autonomy over Language: The parties are free to agree upon the language or languages to be used in the arbitral proceedings.
  • Default Tribunal Determination: Failing agreement, the arbitral tribunal shall determine the language or languages to be used.
  • Scope of Language Application: Applies to written statements of claim/defence, oral hearings, awards, decisions, and communications by the tribunal.
  • Power to Order Translations: The tribunal may order that any documentary evidence shall be accompanied by a translation into the agreed language.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Bharat Aluminium Co. (BALCO) v. Kaiser Aluminium Technical Services Inc., (2012) 9 SCC 552: Discussed party autonomy in determining language and administrative protocols in commercial arbitration.
  • Sundaram Finance Ltd. v. NEPC India Ltd., (1999) 2 SCC 479: Affirmed that procedural choices regarding language and venues are governed by party agreement.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

Specify English as the official language of arbitration in the agreement; if documentary exhibits contain vernacular lease deeds or municipal permits, ensure certified English translations are prepared and submitted under Section 22(2).